Subject	Re: Theoretical: Why not put MAF after the turbo?
Posted by	300ZMang on September 26, 2013 at 6:36 PM
	This message has been viewed 231 times.
In Reply To	Theoretical: Why not put MAF after the turbo? posted by -Grimm- on September 26, 2013 at 05:33 PM
Message	My uneducated guess would be bc the air measured by the maf would be compressed by the time it actually entered the intake. this would likely cause issues. Other forums ask too.... seems all cars are engineered w them before the turbo for a reason.
Follow Ups	Theoretical: Why not put MAF after the turbo? - -Grimm- 17:33:04 09/26/13 One thought - part would probably require more - jzack 18:24:55 09/26/13 Re: Theoretical: Why not put MAF after the turbo? - 300ZMang 18:36:17 09/26/13 Most cars are designed with them at atmospheric pressure - -Grimm- 09:32:00 09/27/13 Go figure - -Grimm- 10:58:06 09/27/13 if you consider that the MAF measures mass flow - aliaZ 18:33:36 09/27/13 The method the MAF uses to monitor air flow - -Grimm- 19:16:23 09/28/13 hmm...after the intercooler would be best in my opinion - inf 23:32:50 09/26/13 That's what I would think - -Grimm- 13:01:34 09/27/13 The purpose of the MAF is not to measure air intake temp. - Dark Diver 06:49:44 09/28/13 Because after the turbo air is hotter and so has greater - Dark Diver 06:54:22 09/28/13 air after the turbo is actually much slower - aliaZ 16:16:58 09/28/13
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.